4.6 (705) · $ 19.00 · In stock
Download scientific diagram | Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B) expanded forms (RISE-L Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA). from publication: Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study | Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review board–exempt chart review of | Static, Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) and Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
Comparison of actual, predicted, and optimal range of motion (ROM) in
James Towner's research works University of Rochester, Rochester (UR) and other places
Oblique view of a continuously expandable interbody spacer in minimized
Comparative Effectiveness of Adjustable Lordotic Expandable versus Static Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
Titanium Interbody Cage: A Case Series Demonstrating Expandable Technology in Spinal Surgery in Peru
Minimally Invasive Spinous Process Fixation and Fusion
Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B)
Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion (PTP LIF) with Anterior Docking: Preliminary functional and radiographic outcomes - North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)
EXPANDABLE CAGES Archives - Page 3 of 4 - SPINEMarketGroup
Magnetic resonance imaging features of disc disease
Modèle Caring-PPH appliqué en soins de réadaptation © (St-Germain
Adjustable Lordotic Expandable Spacers: How Do They Compare to Traditional Static Spacers in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Early Radiological Assessment of Static and Expandable Cages in Lateral Single Position for Indirect Decompression- Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion - ScienceDirect